> I think the idea behind USE_SSE42_CRC32C is to avoid the function pointer > overhead if possible. I looked at switching to always using runtime checks > for this > stuff, and we concluded that we'd better not [0]. > > [0] https://postgr.es/m/flat/20231030161706.GA3011%40nathanxps13
Does that mean we want this feature for the new PCLMUL (and AVX-512) crc32c implementations too? The code for that will look a little ugly, I might need to think about a cleaner way to do this. Raghuveer
