On Tue, 2025-02-11 at 14:02 -0500, Corey Huinker wrote:
>
>
> The previous 0001 is now committed (thanks!) so only one remains.
>
Summary of the decisions made in this thread:
* pg_dump --data-only does not include stats[1]. This behavior was
not fully resolved, but I didn't see a reasonable set of options
where (a) --data-only would include stats; and (b) we could
specify what pg_upgrade needs, which is schema+stats. Jian seemed
to agree. However, this leaves us with the behavior where
--data-only doesn't get everything in SECTION_DATA, which might be
undesirable.
* stats are in SECTION_DATA[2], except for stats on objects that
are created in SECTION_POST_DATA, in which case the stats are
also in SECTION_POST_DATA
- indexes are created in SECTION_POST_DATA, and though plain
indexes don't have stats, expression indexes do
- MVs are normally created in SECTION_PRE_DATA, in which case
the stats are in SECTION_DATA; but MVs can be deferred to
SECTION_POST_DATA due to dependency on a primary key
* SECTION_NONE was proposed, but rejected[2]
* The default is to include the stats.[3]
* pg_dump[all] options are designed to allow specifying any
combination of schema[4], data, and stats:
--schema-only (schema), --no-schema (data+stats)
--data-only (data), --no-data (schema+stats)
--stats-only (stats), --no-stats (schema+data)
* A SECTION_STATS was proposed and rejected due to complexity[5]
* The prefix in the dump output will be "Statistics for " (instead
of "Data for ")[6]
* The TOC description will be "STATISTICS DATA", differentiating
it from an extended statistics object[6]
* pg_upgrade will now pass --no-data (schema+stats) to pg_dump
instead of --schema-only, thereby transferring the stats to the
new cluster[7]
It's been a long thread, so please tell me if I missed something or if
something needs more discussion.
I'm still reviewing v48, but I intend to commit something soon.
Regards,
Jeff Davis
[1]
https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/b40b81d38c3a87fdef61e4f7abfbc7f27c7fbcd9.ca...@j-davis.com
[2]
https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/1798867.1712376328%40sss.pgh.pa.us
[3]
https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/3228677.1713844341%40sss.pgh.pa.us
[4]
https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CACJufxG6K4EAUROhdr0wkzMh5QyFLmdLZeAoh7Vh0-VbuAtHcw%40mail.gmail.com
[5]
https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/3156140.1713817153%40sss.pgh.pa.us
[6]
https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/d8df5339cab25b5720667beaaed8a8bb8e11578c.ca...@j-davis.com
[7]
https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/c2bc08dfec336c03f7a7165d1347e2b52cf98b17.ca...@j-davis.com
