On Mon, Feb 17, 2025 at 2:06 AM Peter Smith <smithpb2...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Fri, Feb 14, 2025 at 4:06 PM Amit Kapila <amit.kapil...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > ... > > > > No, I meant to say that the description didn't looked any better to me > > even after your 0001 patch. The second paragraph started immediately > > in the next line which doesn't make it look any better. If we really > > want to make it look better then one more additional line is required. > > However, I don't want to go in that direction unless we have some > > history of writing the docs similarly. I suggest let's go with your > > 0002 patch as that makes the description concise and clear. > > > > OK. My blank lines patch has been abandoned. Here is just the > 'inactive_since' description patch (now called 0001). >
Looks good to me. I'll push this tomorrow unless there are any further comments/suggestions. -- With Regards, Amit Kapila.
