On Fri, Jul 27, 2018 at 10:01:40AM -0700, Andres Freund wrote: > On 2018-07-27 11:15:00 -0500, Nico Williams wrote: > > Even assuming you can't change the PG license, you could still: > > > > - require disclosure in contributions > > That really has no upsides, except poison the area. [...]
Sure it does: a) it allows PG to reject such contributions unless they come with suitable grants, and b) it gives PG users a legal defense should they ever be sued for infringement on a patent that was not disclosed to PG at the time of the contribution. (b) is a big deal. Nico --
