On Tue, Feb 25, 2025 at 2:44 PM Melanie Plageman <melanieplage...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Tue, Feb 25, 2025 at 5:14 PM Masahiko Sawada <sawada.m...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > Given that we have only about one month until the feature freeze, I > > find that it's realistic to introduce either one parallelism for PG18 > > and at least we might want to implement the one first that is more > > beneficial and helpful for users. Since we found that parallel phase > > III is not very efficient in many cases, I'm thinking that in terms of > > PG18 development, we might want to switch focus to parallel phase I, > > and then go for phase III if we have time. > > Okay, well let me know how I can be helpful. Should I be reviewing a > version that is already posted?
Thank you so much. I'm going to submit the latest patches in a few days for parallelizing the phase I. I would appreciate it if you could review that version. Regards, -- Masahiko Sawada Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com
