> I tried this out, and was pleasantly surprised to see what seemed like > useful summaries of discussions that I was directly involved in.
Thanks for trying it out! And big thanks to Jelte for helping me get involved in the project. > I'm not sure if I'll ever actually use this tool day to day, or even > week to week. But I just might. In any case I'm glad that somebody is > experimenting with it. Out of curiosity, what features would make it most useful to you? Right now it's trying to do all of the following: * Summarize threads * Help you find threads about things you're interested in, independent of what you've commented on * Help you find threads that need a review * Help you find threads to commit, if you're a committer. I think the UX is a bit confusing right now and it might not be obvious how to do all of these things. For example, I think your default view right now is mostly showing you patches you wrote, which is a bit of an accident (if you scroll down, you'll see some patches you didn't author, but are probably relevant to you.) I think we can fix all of this up in the UX, but my question to you might be: * What would a good default view be? * What filters would be useful to you? * How could we optimize your patch-review workflow, in general?