Andrew Dunstan <and...@dunslane.net> writes:
> On 2025-03-04 Tu 5:28 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
>> ... I eventually concluded that there's
>> something wrong with the "scalar glob()" idiom you used.
> Well, in scalar context it should give us back the first item found, or
> undef if nothing is found, AIUI.
That's what I would have thought too, but it didn't seem to work that
way when I was testing the logic standalone: the script processed or
skipped directories according to no rule that I could figure out.
Anyway, for the moment I think we're all right with just the
directory path fix.
regards, tom lane
