On Mon, Mar 3, 2025 at 6:43 PM Melanie Plageman <melanieplage...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Okay, I got cold feet today working on this. I actually think we > probably want some kind of guc set (set like union/intersection/etc > not set like assign a value) infrastructure for gucs that can be equal > to any combination of predetermined values.
I ended up with a patch set that I was happy with which used the list of string GUCs. I committed it in 9219093cab26. It changes log_connections to a list of strings for the different aspects of connection setup and supports the most common inputs for the boolean version of log_connections for backwards compatibility. I did not end up deprecating log_disconnections since it is rather late in the cycle and that change could use more visibility. I suggest proposing that at the beginning of the next release. Thanks for your interest in this topic. - Melanie
