> I think this is a seriously bad idea. The first line is already > overloaded; we don't need several different extensions adding more > stuff to it.
Fair enough. > Plus, this doesn't consider what to do in non-text > output formats. the hook will be a no-op for non-text formats, which is not desirable behavior. I get that also. I have no strong feelings for this, but wanted to see what others think. thanks! -- Sami Imseih
