Dear Amit, > IIUC, workloads C and D will have regression in back branches, and > HEAD will have regression only for workload D. We have avoided > workload C regression in HEAD via commits 7c99dc587a and 3abe9dc188.
Right. > We can backpatch those commits if required, but I think it is better > not to do those as scenarios C and D won't be that common, and we > should go ahead with the fix as it is. In the future, if we get any > way to avoid regression due to scenario-D, then we can do that for the > HEAD branch. OK, let me share patched for back branches. Mostly the same fix patched as master can be used for PG14-PG17, like attached. Regarding the PG13, it cannot be applied as-is thus some adjustments are needed. I will share it in upcoming posts. Best regards, Hayato Kuroda FUJITSU LIMITED
v18_REL_14-0001-Distribute-invalidatons-if-change-in-cata.patch
Description: v18_REL_14-0001-Distribute-invalidatons-if-change-in-cata.patch
v18_REL_15-0001-Distribute-invalidatons-if-change-in-cata.patch
Description: v18_REL_15-0001-Distribute-invalidatons-if-change-in-cata.patch
v18_REL_16-0001-Distribute-invalidatons-if-change-in-cata.patch
Description: v18_REL_16-0001-Distribute-invalidatons-if-change-in-cata.patch
v18_REL_17-0001-Distribute-invalidatons-if-change-in-cata.patch
Description: v18_REL_17-0001-Distribute-invalidatons-if-change-in-cata.patch
v18-0001-Distribute-invalidatons-if-change-in-catalog-tab.patch
Description: v18-0001-Distribute-invalidatons-if-change-in-catalog-tab.patch
