On Tue, 18 Mar 2025 at 05:49, Masahiko Sawada <sawada.m...@gmail.com> wrote: > I've attached the patch. I added the minimum regression tests for that.
I think the change to vacuumlazy.c is ok. The new test you've added creates a table called pvactst2 but then adds a test that uses the pvactst table. Did you mean to skip the DROP TABLE pvactst2;? Is there a reason to keep the maintenance_work_mem=64 for the subsequent existing test? David
