On Tue, Mar 18, 2025 at 4:08 AM Jacob Champion <jacob.champ...@enterprisedb.com> wrote: > 0001 will fix that. I think we should get that and 0002 in, ASAP. (And > the others.)
All pushed (wasn't sure if Daniel was going to but once I got tangled up in all that kqueue stuff he probably quite reasonably assumed that I would :-)). > Thomas has shown me a side quest to get rid of the second > kqueue instance, but so far that is not bearing fruit and we shouldn't > wait on it. Cool, thanks for looking into it anyway. (Feel free to post a nonworking patch with a got-stuck-here-because problem statement...)
