On Fri, Mar 21, 2025 at 6:04 PM Alvaro Herrera <alvhe...@alvh.no-ip.org> wrote: > > On 2025-Mar-21, Ashutosh Bapat wrote: > > > On Thu, Mar 20, 2025 at 8:37 PM vignesh C <vignes...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > Should the copyright be only 2025 in this case: > > > The patch was posted in 2024 to this mailing list. So we better > > protect the copyright since then. I remember a hackers discussion > > where a senior member of the community mentioned that there's not harm > > in mentioning longer copyright periods than being stricter about it. I > > couldn't find the discussion though. > > On the other hand, my impression is that we do update copyright years to > current year, when committing new files of patches that have been around > for long. > > And there's always > https://liferay.dev/blogs/-/blogs/how-and-why-to-properly-write-copyright-statements-in-your-code
Right. So shouldn't the copyright notice be 2024-2025 and not just only 2025? - Next year it will be changed to 2024-2026. -- Best Wishes, Ashutosh Bapat
