On Mon, Mar 24, 2025 at 9:54 AM Michael Paquier <mich...@paquier.xyz> wrote: > On Mon, Mar 24, 2025 at 09:50:36AM +0900, Richard Guo wrote: > > Nice catch. The fix looks good to me. It seems to me that it's fine > > to go without a test case, since the fix is quite straightforward. > > One could argue about using an injection point to force trick the > iteration loop to be cheaper, but I could not really get excited about > the coverage vs the cycles spent for it..
Exactly. Thanks Richard
