Re: Robert Haas > I think that would be better than what we have now, but I still wonder > if we should give some kind of a hint that an external process may be > doing something to that file. Jakub and I may be biased by having just > seen a case of exactly that in the field, but I wonder now how many > 'data beyond EOF' messages are exactly that -- and it's not like the > user is going to guess that 'data beyond EOF' might mean that such a > thing occurred.
HINT: Did anything besides PostgreSQL touch that file? Christoph