> On Aug 2, 2018, at 8:11 AM, Daniel Verite <dan...@manitou-mail.org> wrote: > > That makes sense, thanks for elaborating, although there are also > a fair number of ERRCODE_FEATURE_NOT_SUPPORTED in copy.c > that are raised on forbidden/nonsensical combination of features, > so the consistency argument could work both ways. >
If there is not a strong reason to change the error code, then I believe we should not. The error is the same as it was before, just narrower in scope. Best, -Cynthia
