Hi, On 2025-04-02 14:17:01 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > Andres Freund <and...@anarazel.de> writes: > > Does anybody have an opinion about how non-invasive to be in the > > back-branches? The minimal version is something like this diff: > > Minimal is good -- less chance of breaking anything. > > > - Should we commit the test showing that the naive implementation of > > index-only-bitmap-heapscan is broken, in case somebody wants to > > re-introduce > > it? > > Seems like a good idea. Agreed on HEAD-only for that.
Pushed that way. Thanks for the report and the fix! Greetings, Andres Freund
