On Mon, Mar 24, 2025 at 11:27:15PM +0300, Nikolay Shaplov wrote: > В письме от понедельник, 24 марта 2025 г. 23:04:39 MSK пользователь Nathan > Bossart написал: >> But again, I don't see any strong reason why we must change all such >> reloptions. > > Because code of the engine should be consistent. We can't have two different > ways to do same thing. If we have isset flag, we should go for it everywhere, > where isset logic exists. Or do not use it at all. Other ways will lead us to > a much bigger mess, then we have today.
I don't disagree that it might be desirable for all reloptions with corresponding GUCs to use isset_offset, but I am not following why this is critically important. The out-of-range default approach has worked just fine for years, and I'm not aware of any reason that isset_offset isn't also a suitable solution. -- nathan
