Michael Paquier <mich...@paquier.xyz> writes:
> On Wed, Apr 02, 2025 at 05:29:00PM -0700, Noah Misch wrote:
>> Here it is. Making it fail three times took looping 1383s, 5841s, and 2594s.
>> Hence, it couldn't be expected to catch the regression before commit, but it
>> would have made sufficient buildfarm and CI noise in the day after commit.
> Hmm. Not much of a fan of the addition of a test that has less than
> 1% of reproducibility for the problem, even if it's good to see that
> this can be made portable to run down to v13.
Yeah, it's good to have a test but I doubt we should commit it.
Too many buildfarm cycles will be expended for too little result.
regards, tom lane
