On Mon, 24 Mar 2025 at 22:19, Tender Wang <tndrw...@gmail.com> wrote: >> Maybe I was wrong about writing nothing in master's docs. It might >> still be important to detail this. I don't know the best way to phrase >> that, but maybe something along the lines of: "The query planner >> obtains locks for all partitions which are part of the plan. However, >> when the executor uses a cached plan, locks are only obtained on the >> partitions which remain after partition pruning done during the >> initialization phase of execution, i.e., the ones shown in the EXPLAIN >> output and not the ones referred to by the “Subplans Removed” >> property.". >> >> Any opinions? > > The above sentence looks good to me.
Thanks for looking. I've attached the master and the <= v17 in patch form. Also, the compiled HTML for ease of review. I'll push these in the next few days unless anyone else wants to voice their opinions. David
<<attachment: ddl-partitioning.html.zip>>
v17-0001-Doc-add-information-about-partition-locking.patch
Description: Binary data
v18-0001-Doc-add-information-about-partition-locking.patch
Description: Binary data
