On Fri, Apr 4, 2025 at 7:58 PM Nathan Bossart <nathandboss...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Fri, Apr 04, 2025 at 05:16:43PM +0530, Amit Kapila wrote: > > Can we dodge adding this push call if we restrict the length of the > > origin name to some reasonable limit like 256 or 512 and avoid the > > need of toast altogether? > > We did consider just removing pg_replication_origin's TOAST table earlier > [0], but we decided against it at that time. Maybe it's worth > reconsidering... >
I don't see any good reason in that email for not removing the TOAST table for pg_replication_origin. I would prefer to remove it rather than add protection related to its access. -- With Regards, Amit Kapila.
