> On 8 Apr 2025, at 18:41, Fujii Masao <masao.fu...@oss.nttdata.com> wrote:
> I noticed that the third argument of pg_get_process_memory_contexts() is named > "retries" in pg_proc.dat, while the documentation refers to it as "timeout". I've committed this patch as it was obviously correct, thanks! > Also, as I mentioned earlier, I encountered an issue when calling > pg_get_process_memory_contexts() on the PID of a backend that had just > encountered an error but hadn't finished rolling back. It led to > the following situation: I reconfirmed that the bugfix that Rahila shared in [0] fixes this issue (and will fix others like it, as it's not related to this patch in particular but is a bug in DSM attaching). My plan is to take that for a more thorough review and test tomorrow and see how far it can be safely backpatched. Thanks for bringing this up, sorry about it getting a bit lost among all the emails. -- Daniel Gustafsson [0] cah2l28shr0j3je5v3cxdfmdh-agtsnh2v8pr23x0uhrmbdq...@mail.gmail.com
