> On 8 Apr 2025, at 04:10, Jacob Champion <jacob.champ...@enterprisedb.com>
> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Apr 7, 2025 at 3:26 PM Jacob Champion
> <jacob.champ...@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
>> Sounds good. Any opinions from the gallery on what a "libpq plugin
>> subdirectory" in pkglibdir should be called? ("client", "modules",
>> "plugins"...?)
>
> Hm, one immediate consequence of hardcoding pkglibdir is that we can
> no longer rely on LD_LIBRARY_PATH for pre-installation testing.
> (Contrast with the server, which is able to relocate extension paths
> based on its executable location.)
That strikes me as a signifant drawback.
--
Daniel Gustafsson
