Michael Paquier <mich...@paquier.xyz> writes: > Hmm. I don't think that grouping all these details in the same > comment block is an improvement in this case compared to the first > version, where it is clear which part of the calculation applies to > what. In short, I'm OK with how things are on HEAD.
+1. When I saw the patch I was mainly afraid that pgindent would
make a hash of it. But it didn't, so I'm cool with it as-is.
regards, tom lane
