> > what do you think of this? I think we should set fsync = on > > at least for the part of the test that proceeds the 2 checkpoints and > > set if back to off at the end of the tests for fsync stats. It is concerning > > the tests for the fsync stats are not being exercised in > > the buildfarm. > > One thing I fear here is the impact for animals with little capacity, > like PIs and the like. On the other hand, I could just switch one of > my animals to use fsync = on on at least one branch.
Yes, there should be some tests running for these stats, so if it's possible to enable fsync on one or a few animals, that will be better than nothing. -- Sami