Dear Michael, > 93bc3d75d8e1 has introduced a couple of new injection points, but > these don't follow the convention in-place where points are named > more-or-less-like-that. Please find attached a patch to make all > these more consistent.
I have no objections for the patch, but I feel there are no concrete naming rules (I confused while creating patches). Can we clarify that? E.g., first term should be a module or process, or something like that. Best regards, Hayato Kuroda FUJITSU LIMITED
