Hi, On April 18, 2025 11:17:21 AM GMT+02:00, Thomas Munro <thomas.mu...@gmail.com> wrote: > Doesn't that achieve the goal with fewer steps, using only >portable* POSIX stuff, and keeping all pointers stable? I understand >that pointer stability may not be required (I can see roughly how that >argument is constructed), but isn't it still better to avoid having to >prove that and deal with various other problems completely?
I think we should flat out reject any approach that does not maintain pointer stability. It would restrict future optimizations a lot if we can't rely on that (e.g. not materializing tuples when transporting them from worker to leader; pointering datastructures in shared buffers). Greetings, Andres -- Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
