On Wed, Aug 08, 2018 at 10:50:34AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > Alvaro Herrera <alvhe...@2ndquadrant.com> writes: >> I'm unsure about pg11 -- is it a backbranch already or not? Since we've >> released beta3 already, ISTM we should consider it so. > > No. See > https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/12725.1533737052%40sss.pgh.pa.us > > At this point I'd judge it's still more valuable to minimize differences > between v11 and v12 than to avoid ABI breakages in v11. It's unlikely > this would be the last ABI break before 11.0 anyway.
Thanks! Based on that I will get this patch into HEAD and 11 pretty soon. v10 is definitely out of scope, even if it would have been interesting to make autovacuum more aggressive there as well, as that's where the last improvements have been done. -- Michael
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
