On 2025-May-08, Michael Paquier wrote: > Seems worth doing to simplify the code in the long-run, even if these > require a case-by-case manual lookup.
Yeah, I don't think we can take a patch that simply removes everything that this report mentions, because some of the includes (especially the system includes) could be platform-dependent. Also I imagine some of them depend on compile-time environment -- e.g., I'm pretty sure src/port/pg_popcount_aarch64.c is not going to work well without pg_bitutils.h. > All that is potential work for v19, of course. Yep. -- Álvaro Herrera Breisgau, Deutschland — https://www.EnterpriseDB.com/ "Update: super-fast reaction on the Postgres bugs mailing list. The report was acknowledged [...], and a fix is under discussion. The wonders of open-source !" https://twitter.com/gunnarmorling/status/1596080409259003906
