On Thu, May 8, 2025 at 12:11 PM Heikki Linnakangas <hlinn...@iki.fi> wrote:
> Polished this up a tiny bit, and committed.

Thanks! I think the uint8->int change for cancel_key_len is more than
just cosmetic; it most likely fixes a bug where a key size of 256
wrapped around to 0. I'll double-check that this fixes that later;
I've gotten side-tracked from the protocol stuff a bit.

While I have you, though, is the following just a really complicated
way to say `msgLength - 4`, or is there some other reason to do the
pointer math?

    cancel_key_len = 5 + msgLength - (conn->inCursor - conn->inStart);

--Jacob


Reply via email to