On Mon, Apr 14, 2025 at 5:45 PM Richard Guo <guofengli...@gmail.com> wrote: > It seems what happens is that internally in gram.y (~line 14274), the > DefElem for the not-null option is assigned the name "is_not_null". > As a result, this allows users to explicitly use "is_not_null" as the > option name. However, the value provided for the is_not_null option > in this way might not be a Boolean as expected, which triggers the > assertion. > > I kind of doubt we should allow the use of the "is_not_null" keyword > in the xmltable function. > > Hi Álvaro, what do you think about this?
Just realized Álvaro has switched to a new email address — re-cc'ing. Thanks Richard
