Hello, Álvaro! > I didn't understand why you have a few "v19" patches and also a separate > series of "v19-only-part-3-" patches. Is there duplication? How do > people know which series comes first?
This was explained in the previous email [0]: > Patch itself contains 4 parts, some of them may be reviewed/committed > separately. All commit messages are detailed and contain additional > explanation of changes. > To not confuse CFBot, commits are presented in the following way: part > 1, 2, 3 and 4. If you want only part 3 to test/review – check the > files with "patch_" extensions. They differ a little bit, but changes > are minor. If you have an idea of a better way to handle it, please share. Yes, the current approach is a bit odd. > I think it would be better to get the PDF poster in a wiki page ... in > fact I would suggest to Andrey that he could start a wiki page with all > the PDFs presented at the conference. Distributing a bunch of 2 MB pdf > via the mailing list doesn't sound too great an idea to me. A few > people are having trouble with email quotas in cloud services, and the > list server gets bothered because of it. Kindly don't do that anymore. Oh, you're right—I just didn't think of that. My bad, sorry about that. Best regards, Mikhail. [0]: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/CADzfLwVOcZ9mg8gOG%2BKXWurt%3DMHRcqNv3XSECYoXyM3ENrxyfQ%40mail.gmail.com#52c97e004b8f628473124c05e3bf2da1
