On Tue, May 20, 2025 at 10:28:31PM +0200, Pavel Stehule wrote: > út 20. 5. 2025 v 18:39 odesílatel Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> napsal: > I sent a reduced version a few months ago - from 21 patches to 8 (and it can > be > reduced to six if we postpone tools for detection ambiguity). > The timing was not perfect - the focus was and it is concentrated to finish > pg18.
It was not clear to me that this patch set was being reduced to make it more likely it would be accepted? I thought it was the same patch set since 20??. > I am very sorry if this topic and patches bother anyone. I am afraid if I > close > it to some personal github, it will not be visible, and I am sure this > feature is missing in Postgres. Today we have few workarounds. Some > workarounds > are not available everywhere, some workarounds cannot > be used for security. With integrated solutions some scenarios can be done > more > easily, more secure, faster, more comfortable. It is true, so > mentioned scenarios are not "hot" today. Stored procedures or RLS or migration > procedures from other databases are not extra common. But > who uses it, then he misses session variables. Understood. If people feel it is progressing toward acceptance, I certainly withdraw my objection and apologize. -- Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> https://momjian.us EDB https://enterprisedb.com Do not let urgent matters crowd out time for investment in the future.
