> ISTM that vacuum_xid_failsafe_check() should really be doing something
> similar. For example, it could prorate using
> vacuum_multixact_failsafe_age, calculating a member-space-wise
> threshold to trigger the failsafe at, independent of
> mxid_age(relminmxid) itself.

+1. For the case mentioned in this thread, running
vacuum without index-cleanup did help in their case. So triggering
failsafe based on a member-space-wise threshold sounds like a good idea to me.

I also think exposing the members count [0] will be a good idea
as well. One of the complaints in the postmortem is the lack of
visibility into multixact members.

[0] 
https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/CALdSSPi3Gh08NtcCn44uVeUAYGOT74sU6uei_06qUTa5rMK43g%40mail.gmail.com#bfd9ae766ef42f7599258183aa8ddb3b

--
Sami Imseih
Amazon Web Services (AWS)


Reply via email to