Hi, On May 30, 2025 12:55:28 PM EDT, Christoph Berg <m...@debian.org> wrote: >Re: Andres Freund >> Hi, >> >> On 2025-05-30 18:17:45 +0200, Christoph Berg wrote: >> > A customer reported to use CHECKPOINT before shutdowns to make the >> > shutdowns themselves faster and asked if it was possible to make >> > CHECKPOINT optionally also write out unlogged table data for that >> > purpose. I think the idea makes sense, so there's the patch. >> >> I've seen the need for this quite a few times, fwiw. So +1 to the idea. > >Do we want to officially mention this use case in checkpoint.sgml? I've >already replaced the "is not intended for use during normal operation" >wording by "not required during normal operation", but we might go one >step further and endorse it.
Yes, I think it's good to mention what it is useful for. Greetings, Andres -- Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
