On Fri, May 30, 2025 at 04:55:58PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > Nathan Bossart <nathandboss...@gmail.com> writes: >> For now, I've just added another case block for REGDATABASEOID to match the >> others. If there are problems with non-pinned objects being considered >> shippable, it's not really the fault of this patch. Also, from reading >> around [0], I get the idea that "shippability" might just mean that the >> same object _probably_ exists on the remote server. Plus, there seems to >> be very few use-cases for shipping reg* values in the first place. But >> even after reading lots of threads, code, and docs, I'm still not sure I >> fully grasp all the details here. > > It's all quite squishy, unfortunately, because shippability is a > heuristic rather than something we can determine with certainty > (at reasonable cost, anyway). But I agree with treating regdatabase > the same as the other reg* types, at least until someone shows up > with a counterexample.
Got it, thanks for confirming. -- nathan
