On Fri, May 30, 2025 at 02:23:30PM -0500, Sami Imseih wrote: > While looking into another multixact related topic, I realised that > pg_get_multixact_members > is not documented. I saw the lack of documentation was mentioned here [0], but > this was never committed. > > Any reason it should not be?
It looks to me like Álvaro just never got any feedback on the last patch he sent. I noticed that there are no in-tree uses, but I do see a couple of blog posts that recommend it. In any case, I can't think of a reason it ought to remain undocumented. Want to put together a patch? -- nathan
