Thomas Munro <thomas.mu...@gmail.com> writes: > It's slightly tricky to get smgr to behave differently because of the > contents of a system catalogue!
The mere thought makes me blanch. I'm okay with the GUC part, but I do not think we should put in 0002 --- the odds of causing serious problems greatly outweigh the value, IMO. Fundamental layering violations tend to bite you on tender parts of your anatomy. regards, tom lane