On 06/02/25 14:13, Tom Lane wrote: > Here's a proposed patch for the "=" issue. Whether or not we should > rethink FDW validation behavior, doing so surely couldn't be > back-patched. But I think this much should be.
LGTM Regards, -Chap
On 06/02/25 14:13, Tom Lane wrote: > Here's a proposed patch for the "=" issue. Whether or not we should > rethink FDW validation behavior, doing so surely couldn't be > back-patched. But I think this much should be.
LGTM Regards, -Chap