On 2025/06/02 14:42, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
On 30.05.25 18:12, Fujii Masao wrote:
On 2025/05/31 0:28, Fujii Masao wrote:
  Otherwise, maybe "log_lock_failures" would be better.

Yes, this seems better for consistency with log_lock_waits.

Patch attached.

This looks good to me.

I've pushed the patch. Thanks!

Regards,

--
Fujii Masao
NTT DATA Japan Corporation



Reply via email to