On Fri, May 30, 2025 at 4:41 PM Ajin Cherian <itsa...@gmail.com> wrote: > > I ran a series of tests using both streaming and non-streaming logical > replication modes with the patch. In non-streaming mode, the patch > showed a significant performance improvement — up to +68% in the best > case, with a -6% regression in the worst case. > > In contrast, results in streaming mode were more modest. With the > default logical_decoding_work_mem of 64MB, I observed a +11.6% > improvement at best and a -6.7% degradation at worst. Increasing the > work memory provided some incremental improvements: > > At 128MB: +14.43% (best), -0.65% (worst) > > At 256MB: +12.55% (best), -0.03% (worst) > > At 512MB: +16.98% (best), -2.48% (worst) > > It's worth noting that streaming mode is enabled by default in logical > decoding, and as such, it's likely the mode most users and > applications are operating in. Non-streaming mode is typically only > used in more specialized setups or older deployments. Given this, the > broader benefit of the patch - especially considering its complexity, > may depend on how widely non-streaming mode is used in practice. >
You haven't shared the exact test scenario, but I am assuming the above tests are for very large transactions, as you are comparing streaming and non-streaming modes. Can we see results with short transaction size (say one insert or one update, or one delete) as well? -- With Regards, Amit Kapila.