Andres Freund <and...@anarazel.de> writes: >> I've been wondering about adding wrapping something like that in a >> pg_assume(expr) or such.
> I've been once more annoyed by this warning. Here's a prototype for the
> approach outlined above.
Looks plausible by eyeball. I did notice a typo in the comment:
+ * pg_assume(expr) stats that we assume `expr` to evaluate to true. In assert
s/stats/states/, I think you meant.
regards, tom lane
