On Thu, Jun 05, 2025 at 08:05:20PM -0400, Andres Freund wrote: > There has been plenty discussion about GB18030, and it seems we aren't likely > to be able to drop that.
Yes, as per upthread. > I think there are a lot easier cases though. The easiest probably is > MULE_INTERNAL - all discussions referencing it seem to be about oddities of > MULE_INTERNAL, not about using it. I think it's been effectively unused since > it's introduction. Due to not even having a conversion path to UTF-8 it's > really not practically usable IMO. Perhaps, yes. I still need to do some homework here and gather some data to share, FWIW. -- Michael
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
