HI > FWIW, I'm not sure what's the benefit of the proposal which comes down > to the removal of a bitwise NOT, except more code conflicts with back > branches. Agree
On Tue, Jun 10, 2025 at 3:37 PM Michael Paquier <mich...@paquier.xyz> wrote: > On Mon, Jun 09, 2025 at 10:54:43PM -0300, Fabrízio de Royes Mello wrote: > > The refactoring LGTM but do we really need two patches? IMHO you can just > > merge everything into a single patch. > > FWIW, I'm not sure what's the benefit of the proposal which comes down > to the removal of a bitwise NOT, except more code conflicts with back > branches. > -- > Michael >
