On Wed, Jun 11, 2025 at 12:51 PM Jim Jones <jim.jo...@uni-muenster.de>
wrote:

> On 10.06.25 15:37, Florents Tselai wrote:
> > EDIT: There are test under `src/psql/t` , not sure though how much
> > coverage they have,
> > but most importantly how it’d look like for this case.
>
> I took a look at these files, but I'm still unsure how to use them for
> automated prompt checking - I'm not super familiar with the perl tests,
> to be honest.
>

>From Tom at the discord channel

* Yeah, you can see from the code coverage report [1] that
session_username() isn't reached in our tests. It's only used if the psql
prompt string is set to use it, and testing that in an interesting way is
kind of hard --- our standard regression-script framework doesn't expose
prompt output. On balance I'm not sure that covering session_username()
would be worth the test cycles. [1]
https://coverage.postgresql.org/src/bin/psql/common.c.gcov.html
<https://coverage.postgresql.org/src/bin/psql/common.c.gcov.html>*

So, yes I don't think we can auto-test it really, thus we'll have to rely
on these simple functional tests.

Reply via email to