On Wed, Jun 11, 2025 at 12:51 PM Jim Jones <jim.jo...@uni-muenster.de> wrote:
> On 10.06.25 15:37, Florents Tselai wrote: > > EDIT: There are test under `src/psql/t` , not sure though how much > > coverage they have, > > but most importantly how it’d look like for this case. > > I took a look at these files, but I'm still unsure how to use them for > automated prompt checking - I'm not super familiar with the perl tests, > to be honest. > >From Tom at the discord channel * Yeah, you can see from the code coverage report [1] that session_username() isn't reached in our tests. It's only used if the psql prompt string is set to use it, and testing that in an interesting way is kind of hard --- our standard regression-script framework doesn't expose prompt output. On balance I'm not sure that covering session_username() would be worth the test cycles. [1] https://coverage.postgresql.org/src/bin/psql/common.c.gcov.html <https://coverage.postgresql.org/src/bin/psql/common.c.gcov.html>* So, yes I don't think we can auto-test it really, thus we'll have to rely on these simple functional tests.