Hi, On 2025-06-09 12:59:20 +0900, Michael Paquier wrote: > While hacking a different patch, I've noticed that a couple of %llu > did not get the PRIu64 call in the AIO code, and I don't see why we > could not switch them. These have been introduced in commits that got > into the tree after Peter's 15a79c73111f.
FWIW, I find it utterly unsurpising that new users of %llu were introduced after 15a79c73111f. For one, 15a79c73111f explicitly says "(minimal trial)" in the subject line, it'd have hardly been sensible to introduce PRI* uses at that point. Only a0ed19e0a9e, changed most of the uses (after e.g. the io_uring uses were introduced). For another, how is everyone even supposed to even have known about this new policy, it was just discussed in a long thread, at a very busy time? Even now I suspect we'll grow more %ll[ud] users, it's after all what we've been trained to do for quite a while now. Greetings, Andres Freund
