On Mon, 12 May 2025 at 19:33, Andreas Karlsson <andr...@proxel.se> wrote: > > I have fixed that one and some other issues locally and will submit a > new version in a while after I have added more tests because you are > very correct in that a big issue with my last version of the patch was > the big lack of tests and lack of making sure all features which > interact with UPSERT actually worked with my changes. Plus some islation > tests would be nice to have. >
+1. Don't forget to move the CF entry to the next open CF. FYI, over on [1] I proposed more tests and doc updates for RLS. I think those updates might make it easier to test and document the RLS aspects of this patch. [1] https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/CAEZATCWqnfeChjK=n1v_dyzt4rt4mnq+ybf9c0qxdytvmsy...@mail.gmail.com Regards, Dean
