On Mon, Jun 30, 2025 at 7:29 AM Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh.bapat....@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Sat, Jun 28, 2025 at 4:02 AM Nathan Bossart <nathandboss...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > On Thu, Jun 12, 2025 at 03:10:56PM -0500, Nathan Bossart wrote: > > > Barring comments/objections, I'll plan on committing/back-patching this in > > > the near future. > > > > Here is what I have staged for commit. I ended up moving it to the > > "Transaction ID and Snapshot Information Functions" table, which is what I > > think you had originally proposed. Creating a new section for this seemed > > unnecessary, and this table already has one multixact-related function. > > WFM.
Correct, I originally proposed the "Transaction ID and Snapshot Information Functions" section, but as stated in [0], pg_get_multixact_members does not fit the description of the section as it is described as "The main use of these functions is to determine which transactions were committed between two snapshots." IMO, it makes more sense to keep this function in a new section as we have in v4. [0] https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAA5RZ0vtSPzx%2B8HW1gohcWPgURX2VST5j3Nqh2OL6h9dSk0HSg%40mail.gmail.com -- Sami
