Hi, On Mon, 30 Jun 2025 at 17:45, Jacob Champion <jacob.champ...@enterprisedb.com> wrote: > > On Wed, Jun 25, 2025 at 3:46 AM Nazir Bilal Yavuz <byavu...@gmail.com> wrote: > > I wanted to experiment with it. > > That was fast, thank you! > > > First, I got the current list of > > features from upstream, then disabled the auto features, then > > explicitly enabled these features. I did this only for FreeBSD to show > > my idea roughly. > > > > There are two patches; 0001 disables auto features for all of the > > tasks and 0002 explicitly enables these features for FreeBSD. > > Just from a stylistic perspective, I think I'd prefer for > `--auto-features=disabled` to be folded into the beginning of the > MESON_FEATURES variable. Or is there another reason to control them > fully independently?
No, I had thought people would prefer to control auto-features from one central place but apparently I was wrong :) I will update the patch according to this. > Also: how do we ensure that none of the previously enabled features > were missed in this list, for all the OSes we've modified? (I'm a > Meson novice.) I am not sure, I do not know if there is a way to ensure that. I just manually checked features from the end of the 'meson setup' command's output. I think this should be enough but of course an automated way would be better if there is any. > > What do you think about this approach? If you are okay with this, I > > can apply it to all CI tasks (and possibly create another thread for > > it). > > Seems good to me. I think a new top-level thread would be good too, to > get more eyes on the changes. Thanks! I will create the thread soon. -- Regards, Nazir Bilal Yavuz Microsoft