Pavel Stehule <pavel.steh...@gmail.com> writes:
> Looks so nobody has any motivation to do some deeper changes to reduce
> prohibition of reserved words. It is true, so in the real world it is not
> an issue.
Certainly anyone who's annoyed is free to do more work here.
> All tests passed without problems. I'll mark this patch as ready for commit.
> Maybe the usage of unreserved words as variables or field names can be
> tested a little bit more. See patch 0003
Pushed with the test case as you suggested. Thanks for reviewing!
regards, tom lane
